Skip to main content

Chinese billionaire Jack Ma tweeted for the first time ever to say he's started shipping 1 million masks and 500,000 coronavirus testing kits to the US

Alibaba billionaire Jack Ma.
Alibaba billionaire Jack Ma.
Ruben Sprich/Reuters
  • Alibaba billionaire Jack Ma announced on Friday his charitable foundation would donate 500 million coronavirus testing kits and 1 million face masks to the US.
  • Ma joined Twitter this month, and sent his first tweet on Saturday to say the first shipment of aid supplies was on its way from Shanghai.
  • Ma previously pledged $14.5 million towards the development of a vaccine against the virus.
China's richest man appears to be following through on his promise to donate materials to the US to help fight the coronavirus outbreak.
Alibaba billionaire Jack Ma pledged on Friday to donate 500 million virus testing kits and 1 million face masks to the US.
Ma tweeted Sunday to say the first shipment of masks and kits was ready to fly out of Shanghai. It's the first time the billionaire has ever posted to Twitter.
OxyBreath Pro
www.oxybreathpros.com
His announcement did not specify where in the US the masks and tests were destined.
Ma also pledged 100 million yuan ($14.5 million) towards the development of a vaccine in late January. And earlier in March, the billionaire donated a further $2.15 million to the Peter Doherty Institute for Infection and Immunity in Australia, again with a view towards developing a vaccine.
Ma is far from the only billionaire to pour money into fighting the coronavirus. Bill and Melinda Gates pledged $100 million through their charitable foundation in February, and the Gates Foundation is funding a scheme to distribute at-home testing kits in Washington State.
The Chan-Zuckerberg Initiative — the philanthropic organization founded by Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan — announced it has formed a coronavirus "task force" and is funding the purchase of new COVID-19 diagnostic machines in the Bay Area, California.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the