Skip to main content

Fox News hosts Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham have changed their coronavirus tune in a big way



Fox News personality Sean Hannity, an ally and informal adviser to President Trump, visiting the White House briefing room.

 
What a difference a few days, and a few thousand coronavirus cases in the U.S., make.
On Fox News in recent weeks, downplaying the outbreak was all the rage. Pete Hegseth said “the more I learn about this, the less there is to worry about.” Jeanine Pirro said the mainstream-media “doesn’t reflect reality.” Ashley Earhardt claimed “it’s actually the safest time to fly.” Sean Hannity and Laura Ingraham talked about the press as “panic pushers” stirring up “mass hysteria.”
And perhaps the most glaring of all came from Trish Regan over on Fox Business, who accused the “liberal media” of using the coronavirus “to impeach the president. Her monologue may have cost her the job, though she chalked it up to Fox’s “prioritizing its coverage during market hours.”
The tone has clearly shifted among the notable right-wing personalities on the network, as you can see from this Washington Post video that racked up more than 5 million views overnight:
Tucker Carlson was notably absent from the compilation. The “Tucker Carlson Tonight” host strayed from his colleagues early when he described the virus as “a very serious problem.”
The rest of the network now appears to be on board, with the “Fox & Friends” bunch spreading out across the studio on Tuesday to demonstrate best practices. 
OxyBreath Pro

“To be responsible, to show social distancing, all three of us are apart — same studio, plenty of distance,” Brian Kilmeade told viewers to start the broadcast.
Meanwhile, the number of COVID-19 cases in the U.S. continues to rise as more testing options become available. There are now 6,510 cases and have been 114 deaths across the country, according to data aggregated by Johns Hopkins University.
The fear is reflected in the stock market, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, -7.494% down more than 1,000 points in Wednesday’s trading session. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the