Skip to main content

Trump officials get pushback from GOP on coronavirus stimulus plans








© Greg Nash Trump officials get pushback from GOP on coronavirus stimulus plans
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin and National Economic Council Director Larry Kudlow ran into Senate Republican opposition on key points of their economic rescue plan Tuesday when they outlined a multi-pronged proposal to key the country from falling into a severe recession.

Many Republican senators feel frustrated they were largely cut out of negotiations with Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) that resulted in the speedy passage of a House bill estimated to cost more than $100 billion and President Trump says he will sign.
At a lengthy lunch meeting in the Russell Senate Office Building, Republican senators pushed back on two key points: distributing direct cash payments to Americans impacted by the coronavirus crisis and providing tens of billions of dollars in economic assistance to the ailing airline industry.
Senior administration officials also heard criticism of the proposal Mnuchin negotiated with Pelosi to provide up to two-weeks of paid sick leave for the employees of small businesses. Senate Judiciary Committee Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) objected to the administration decision to prioritize direct payments to Americans to juice up the faltering economy, which he called a "money wasted."
"It won't help the economy just throwing money at a problem," Graham said. "I don't know why giving a thousand dollars on top of their paycheck makes any sense now because there's no economy to participate in. I'd rather take that money and shore up health care systems.
"I said an extra thousand on top of your paycheck is money wasted right now," he added. "I don't think people are looking for a one time check from the government."
The administration officials also ran into strong Republican pushback on a proposal to bail out the airline industry. U.S. airlines on Monday asked for $50 billion in economic assistance to make up for a precipitous drop in travel because of federal warnings and guidelines.
"A lot of us our against a bailout," said Senate Appropriations Committee Chairman Richard Shelby (R-Ala.).
"I brought it up. I said loans, yes. They have a lot of collateral. Collateralize the loans, make sure they're paid back," he said.
"As far as writing a check for bailout, I'd be totally against that," he added.
Trump and Mnuchin doubled down on their call for economic relief of the airline industry earlier Tuesday.
"The airline industry will be in great shape," Trump pledged.
"We're going big," he later added. "We don't airlines going out of business. We don't want people losing their jobs and not having money to live."
Mnuchin told reporters Tuesday morning that the airlines are in danger of grinding to a "halt" and said "we want to maintain for critical travel the right to have domestic travel."
Mnuchin made clear Tuesday that the president is prioritizing direct payments to Americans instead of cutting the payroll tax, a proposal Trump floated last week at a lunch meeting with Republicans.
Mnuchin and Kudlow made little push for the payroll tax cut Tuesday, said senators, a reflection that the idea has only mixed support in the Senate GOP conference and faces staunch Democratic opposition.
"I think this is something the White House is strongly inclined to," said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), who said the proposal is now being considered "in lieu of the payroll tax cut."
"The more they look at the payroll tax cut, it just wouldn't deliver fast enough," he said.
Hawley, who supports the proposal, said he wants to calibrate cash payments to "family size and family need."
Mnuchin called Hawley's proposal "a good idea."
Mnuchin and Kudlow also heard criticisms of the House-passed coronavirus relief bill, which the administration negotiated directly with Pelosi, leaving GOP senators on the sidelines.
Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) raised his concern Tuesday over the decision to give employees of medium and small businesses affected by the coronavirus two-weeks of paid sick leave, which will be refunded to employers through tax credits.
Unlike Graham and some other colleagues, he wants the Treasury Department to immediately cut $1000 tax-rebate checks to every adult tax filer making less than $100,000 per year and $500 for each dependent.
"I think the paid leave provisions are too complicated. They won't work fast enough. They don't cover enough infected workers. They probably will even incentivize people for businesses to lay employees off and probably go bankrupt," he said.
Cotton urged the Senate to "press pause" on the House-passed bill.
"We're here all week long," he said. "We should get it right on what the House sent us rather than just try to get it fast."
Cotton said a better solution is "to use the unemployment system to get checks out to any kind of affected worker, not just unemployed workers."
Sen. Mike Braun (R-Ind.) said he's concerned about provisions in the House-passed bill that would funnel money in the form of loans of small businesses to help them ride through the crisis and avoid laying off workers.
Braun said the safety net of unemployment benefits should be relied on instead.
Braun said he raised objections with Mnuchin on "why can't we use unemployment insurance" instead of "doing it through the payroll accounts of small businesses."
Despite the pushback on the House-passed bill, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) announced Tuesday afternoon that he plans to bring it to the floor for a vote and then focus on additional stimulus by passing a "phase three" bill.
"We're going to take up and pass the House bill," he said. "Then Senate Republicans in conjunction with the administration are going to write a next bill.
"We will then discuss with the Democrats what we can agree to pass, which of course will take 60 votes. The details of that obviously have not been determined yet."
He also pledged the Senate will not leave town until it has passed both bills.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the