Skip to main content

Jen Psaki Has It Out With Fox News Reporter Peter Doocy Over Biden Snub


White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki tells Fox reporter Peter Doocy like it is. (Photo: SAUL LOEB via Getty Images)
White House Press Secretary Jen Psaki tells Fox reporter Peter Doocy like it is. (Photo: SAUL LOEB via Getty Images)

White House press secretary Jen Psaki wasn’t having it when Fox News reporter Peter Doocy complained Friday about not being called on by President Joe Biden at his first news conference the previous day.

The barely patient Psaki asked Doocy: “We’re here having a conversation, aren’t we? And do I take questions from you every time you come to the briefing room? Has the president taken questions from you since he came into office, yes or no?”

Doocy admitted that the president has been “very generous with his time with Fox” but complained that he sometimes has to “shout” questions at Biden when the president is talking to reporters.

He claimed that Fox News was left off a “list” Biden had of news organizations to call on — a statement Doocy later contradicted on his own network.

“Fox is the only member of the five-network TV pool that has never been on the list in front of the president. I’m just curious if that is kind of official administration policy,” Doocy said.

He pressed again about the supposed “list” that Biden is given. Fox News has “never [been] on it dating back to when he resumed in-person events in Wilmington during the end campaign.”

That’s when Psaki had enough.

“I would say that I’m always happy to have this conversation with you, even about the awesome socks you are wearing today, and have a conversation with you even when we disagree,” she said. “The president’s taken your questions, and I’m looking forward to doing ‘Fox News Sunday’ this Sunday for the third time in the last few months. I think we’ve got to move on because we’ve got limited time.”

Biden took questions from journalists from 10 of the 30 news organizations that were represented at the press briefing on Thursday — but not from Fox. A reporter from HuffPost was also at the press conference but was not called on.

Doocy later complained on air that he had a “binder full of questions” to ask the president, a goofy reference to now Sen. Mitt Romney’s comment during a 2012 Republican presidential debate that he had “whole binders full of women” he considered for his Cabinet when he was governor of Massachusetts.

Doocy also admitted that he had no idea if Fox News was or was not on any list of networks Biden may have had to call on. “I’m not sure if that was the end of the list” when Biden ended the press conference, Doocy said. “If we were on it, he did not make it down that far.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the