Skip to main content

Republicans mocked after marking Presidents Day by insulting Biden – and praising Nixon and Trump

 

A Presidents’ Day joke from the official Republican Party Twitter feed has been ridiculed for disrespecting Joe Biden while hailing Richard Nixon as among the “great US presidents”.

Borrowing the meme of the “not you” grid, the party singled out eight past Republican presidents for praise: Abraham Lincoln, Calvin Coolidge, Dwight Eisenhower, Nixon, Ronald Reagan, both George Bushes, and of course, Donald Trump.

Mr Biden, meanwhile, is shown wearing a mask designed to stop the spread of Covid-19, which Donald Trump famously contracted late in his presidency.

Follow the latest updates on Trump

The reaction to the bizarrely pro-Nixon message was swift and caustic, with anti-Republican commentators and tweeters seizing on the implications immediately – and pointing out that unlike Nixon, who resigned from office before being formally ejected by Congress, Donald Trump was in fact impeached twice for alleged crimes committed during his tenure.

Others noted that the party included Nixon at the expense of other Republicans, including Gerald Ford (who pardoned him), Teddy Roosevelt, or Ulysses S Grant.

Others still pointed out that the eight men selected for elevation in contrast to Biden would hardly have agreed with the selection as a whole.

Others on the right who reject Trumpism as a philosophy issued more general objections. As former Tea Party Republican turned Trump opponent Joe Walsh tweeted: “Every day, the @GOP does or says something to make me feel really good about my decision two years ago to leave the Republican Party. Every single day.”

Conservative commentator Bill Kristol, meanwhile, offered this view: “This is mostly juvenile and vulgar. But we are on the verge of war in Europe. It would be good if elected Republicans, GOP candidates, those who’ve served in Republican administrations--made it clear @GOP does not speak for what remains of a decent and patriotic Republican Party.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the