Skip to main content

GOP officials made fake 'official-looking' brochure advertising refugee benefits for migrants in Venezuella and Mexico

GOP officials made fake 'official-looking' brochure advertising refugee benefits for migrants in Venezuella and Mexico

 Photo: Rebecca Blackwell/AP

  • Migrants who were flown to Martha's Vineyard filed a lawsuit against Gov. Ron DeSantis on Tuesday.
  • Migrants were made to believe that they would receive refugee benefits upon arrival, lawsuit says.
  • They received "official-looking materials" including a brochure "manufactured" by Florida officials.

Florida officials and agencies used several tactics to lure migrants on a chartered flight to Martha's Vineyard, including making a fake brochure that purports refugee benefits, according to a class-action lawsuit.

On September 14, 50 migrants, most of whom were from Venezuela, were flown in two chartered planes from Texas to Martha's Vineyard as part of a political stunt by Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to criticize border policies under the Biden administration.

Now, a group of those migrants is taking action against DeSantis and other state officials and agencies in a class-action lawsuit filed on Tuesday. Lawyers representing the migrants accused DeSantis and Florida officials of plotting an "illegal scheme" to "defraud vulnerable immigrants to advance a political motive."

Part of that "scheme," according to the lawsuit, was to make "false promises and false representations" of potential employment and housing, among other benefits, upon arriving on Martha's Vineyard.

For example, just before they arrived on the island, migrants were given a "shiny, red folder" filled with "official-looking materials," including a brochure titled "Massachusetts Refugee Benefits."

    

The brochure contained misleading information on resettlement aid that, in reality, was not available for migrants seeking asylum in Massachusetts, as previously reported by Insider.

The lawsuit goes further by accusing DeSantis and other officials of fabricating the leaflet entirely.

"On information and belief, the brochure was manufactured by Defendants," the lawsuit read, adding that it "echoed the type of false representation" that migrants were given by word-of-mouth, such as assistance with housing, food, and employment in the first 90 days upon arrival in Massachusetts.

A spokesperson for DeSantis did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

According to the lawsuit, the brochure also took language from an existing state program, the Massachusetts Refugee Resettlement Program, which none of the migrants were eligible for.

"This brochure was not prepared by the Massachusetts Office for Refugees and Immigrants, or any other Massachusetts agency or immigration services organization," the lawsuit stated.

A representative from the state's Office for Refugees and Immigrants did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the