Skip to main content

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

 Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over.


U.S. Food & Drug Administration
10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.06 . 0 2
Silver Spring, MD 20993
www.fda.gov
June 9, 2023
Re: DEN220078
Trade/Device Name: Eroxon
Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021
Regulation Name: Non-medicated topical formulation for treatment of erectile dysfunction
Regulatory Class: II
Product Code: QWW
Dated: January 4, 2023
Received: March 28, 2023
Dear Ken James:
The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has
completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over-the-counter device
under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use:
Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over.
FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. This order, therefore, classifies the
Eroxon, and substantially equivalent devices of this generic type, into Class II under the generic name non-
medicated topical formulation for treatment of erectile dysfunction.
FDA identifies this generic type of device as:
Non-medicated topical formulation for treatment of erectile dysfunction. A non-medicated
topical formulation for treatment of erectile dysfunction is a device that is applied on the penis and
stimulates the nerve endings by inducing a temperature change, leading to tumescence and erection.
Section 513(f)(2) of the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (the FD&C Act) was amended by section 607 of the
Food and Drug Administration Safety and Innovation Act (FDASIA) on July 9, 2012. This law provides two
options for De Novo classification. First, any person who receives a "not substantially equivalent" (NSE)
determination in response to a 510(k) for a device that has not been previously classified under the Act may
request FDA to make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act. On
December 13, 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act removed a requirement that a De Novo request be submitted
within 30 days of receiving an NSE determination. Alternatively, any person who determines that there is no
DEN220078 - Ken James Page
2
legally marketed device upon which to base a determination of substantial equivalence may request FDA to
make a risk-based classification of the device under section 513(a)(1) of the Act without first submitting a
510(k). FDA shall, within 120 days of receiving such a request, classify the device. This classification shall
be the initial classification of the device. Within 30 days after the issuance of an order classifying the device,
FDA must publish a notice in the Federal Register announcing the classification.
On October 21, 2022, FDA received your De Novo requesting classification of the Eroxon. The request was
submitted under section 513(f)(2) of the FD&C Act. In order to classify the Eroxon into class I or II, it is
necessary that the proposed class have sufficient regulatory controls to provide reasonable assurance of the
safety and effectiveness of the device for its intended use. After review of the information submitted in the
De Novo request FDA has determined that, for the previously stated indications for use, the Eroxon can be
classified in class II with the establishment of special controls for class II. FDA believes that class II
(special) controls provide reasonable assurance of the safety and effectiveness of the device type. The
identified risks and mitigation measures associated with the device type are summarized in the following
table:
Risks to Health
Mitigation Measures
Failure to identify correct population and
condition, leading to ineffective use
Labeling
Deleterious effect on condoms leading to
pregnancy or transmission of sexually
transmitted infections
Non-clinical performance testing
Labeling
Shelf-life testing
Adverse tissue reaction
Biocompatibility testing
Labeling
Non-clinical performance testing
Pain or discomfort
Non-clinical performance testing
Labeling
Shelf-life testing
In combination with the general controls of the FD&C Act, the non-medicated topical formulation for
treatment of erectile dysfunction. is subject to the following special controls:
(1) The device must be demonstrated to be biocompatible.
(2) Non-clinical performance testing must demonstrate that the device performs as intended under
anticipated conditions of use. The following performance characteristics must be tested:
(i) Condom compatibility;
(ii) Temperature profile evaluation; and
(iii) Verification of device specifications.
(3) Performance data must support the shelf life of the device by demonstrating the device meets its
specifications over the identified shelf life.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the