Skip to main content

Bill Barr's comments on Donald Trump's discussion of potential executions raise concerns

Bill Barr's comments on Donald Trump's discussion of potential executions raise concerns.

By Jone Jones | Sunday, April 28, 2024 | 5 min read

Former Attorney General William Barr's statement regarding former President Donald Trump's remarks is quite significant. It suggests that Trump frequently discussed extreme measures like executing his political opponents. Such comments, if accurate, would undoubtedly raise concerns about Trump's commitment to democratic norms and the rule of law. Barr's statement underscores the contentious and tumultuous nature of Trump's presidency, particularly regarding his rhetoric and approach to political opponents.

Barr's stance, as reported, is indeed remarkable. Despite his prior warning about the risks associated with voting for Trump, he ultimately chose to support him in the November election. Moreover, Barr's assertion that Trump frequently discussed the notion of executing his political rivals adds another layer to the complexities of Trump's presidency and the dynamics within his administration. It raises questions about the extent to which such discussions may have influenced decision-making processes and the overall climate within the White House.

Barr's nonchalant admission during the CNN interview, particularly in response to Kaitlan Collins mentioning Alyssa Farah Griffin's claim about Trump's suggestion of executing a White House leaker, is significant. It provides further insight into the atmosphere within the Trump administration and the extent of Trump's rhetoric regarding extreme measures against perceived adversaries. Barr's acknowledgment of being present during such discussions underscores the gravity of the situation and raises questions about the ethical and moral considerations within the highest echelons of government during that time.

Barr recalled Trump's anger over the issue but couldn't distinctly recall the term "executing" being used. However, he didn't dismiss the possibility and acknowledged Trump's tendency to make such statements in fits of temper. He expressed doubt about Trump's willingness to follow through with such extreme actions.

Collins pressed further, asking why such remarks shouldn't be taken seriously.

Barr argued that ultimately, such extreme orders wouldn't be carried out, and reasoned that Trump could be persuaded to reconsider. However, Collins countered that even if the orders weren't executed, the threat remained.

Barr maintained his stance, insisting that there was no actual threat behind Trump's statements.

“I don‘t think the threat is there. The thing that I worry about President Trump is not that he’s going to become an autocrat and do those kinds of things,” Barr said.

When Collins inquired as to why Barr believes that, and whether or not it’s a “hunch,” Barr responded that it was just his “feeling.”

“Having worked for him and seen him in action, I don’t think he would actually go and kill political rivals and things like that,” Barr claimed.

Later in the interview, Collins read aloud Trump’s mocking response to Barr following his endorsement. Barr replied by effectively kowtowing: “Classic Trump,” he said.

The “real threat to Democracy,” Barr claimed, came from the Biden administration, as opposed to the former president who has been indicted for his role in the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Who is the first and only President to instigate a coup?

Dark Brandon Vs Donald Hoover Trump

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions

Can MAGA Insurrectionists Launch Attacks Against the Supreme Court Over its Rulings? Exploring the Limits of Political Influence on Judicial Decisions. In the wake of contentious legal battles and polarizing decisions, the question arises: Can the "Make America Great Again" (MAGA) movement launch attacks against the Supreme Court over its rulings? As the highest court in the land, the U.S. Supreme Court is often a focal point of scrutiny and criticism from various political factions, but the extent to which these attacks can influence or undermine its authority is a matter of debate and legal interpretation. Historical Context:  Throughout American history, the Supreme Court has faced criticism and resistance from various quarters. From landmark decisions on civil rights and social issues to contentious rulings on political matters, the Court has been no stranger to public backlash. However, the principles of judicial independence and the separation of powers enshrined in the

Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over

  Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over . U.S. Food & Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Doc ID# 04017.0 6 . 0 2 Silver Spring, M D 20993 www.fda.gov June 9, 2023 Re: DEN220078 Trade/Device Name: Eroxon Regulation Number: 21 CFR 876.5021 Regulation Name: Non- medicated top ical formula tion for trea tment of erec tile dysfu nction Regulatory Class: II Product Code: QWW Dated: January 4, 2023 Received: March 28, 2023 Dear Ken James: The Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has completed its review of your De Novo request for classification of the Eroxon, an over- the - counter device under 21 CFR Part 801 Subpart C with the following indications for use: Treatment of erectile dysfunction in adult males aged 22 years and over. FDA concludes that this device should be classified into Class II. Th is order, therefor